Per-location attribution across every clinic, from one team and one strategy

A group dashboard that only shows aggregate numbers fails the moment a partner asks why one clinic underperforms

Per-location cost-per-exam varies across a group, so aggregate reporting hides exactly the variance you are responsible for managing. We name and serve each location individually: every clinic is reported on its own cost-per-exam and ad-to-booking attribution, then rolled up to a group view, so a marketing lead can defend per-location performance and an owner-operator can tie spend to bookings site by site. The buyer here is the practice owner-operator with multiple sites, the group marketing lead, or the office and operations manager who answers for the numbers.

Independent optometrists also concentrate inside alliances and buying groups, and those groups sell marketing in-house and compete with you. We understand that context and out-prove the in-house offering on the two axes it cannot match: per-location, ad-to-booking attribution and daily tracking of 1,000+ keyword positions, rather than a quarterly traffic report.

Multi-location is infrastructure we have already built

Scaling marketing across clinics without scaling cost is a system, not a headcount problem. We run a genuine multi-location optometry group across three cities on centralized local-search and per-location Google Ads infrastructure, with each clinic's Google Business Profile optimized independently and reporting that rolls up to a group view and breaks down to each site. The multi-location eye care case study shows the model, and scaling multi-location healthcare practices details how each location ranks on its own while the group benefits from shared domain authority and campaign learnings.